Snowboard “industry” Knowledge 101:

 

Current Issue

NEW 3D COVER
ON NEWSTANDS NOW !

Weather ::

Who's online

There are currently 5 users and 352 guests online.
Posted on September 05 2006 at 11:14pm by The Public Advisor

Contribution from the Community...

Okay since there have been many requests for enlightenment here is the 401 on your snowboard industry:

Quicksilver owns the following:

DC Shoe Company, Rossignal, Dynastar, Leki, Look, Hot, Hammer, Gnu, Lib Tech, Roxy, of course Quicksilver and it’s subordinate brand names, and some others that I can’t remember.

Billabong recently bought Nixon Watches.

K2 is on the verge of becoming a Billion Dollar Per Year (Yes I said Billion) corporation that is no longer operated out of Washington and focused on your snow sports industry. The Corporate Giant owns and makes 95% of following in China:

K2 Skis, K2 Snowboards, K2 Skates, K2 Bikes, Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, (Yes baseball bats and gloves) Planet Earth, Adio Shoes, Hawk Clothing, Liquid, Pflueger, Shakespeare Fishing Poles, Worth Inc., DeBeer Lacrosse, Dana Design, Brass Eagle, Viewloader, JT USA, Challenge Park, Stearns, Hilton, (Not the Hotel Chain) Ride Snowboards, Ride Snowboard Bindings, Holden Outerwear, Cappel Clothing, 5150 Snowboards, Morrow Snowboards, Atlas Snowshoes, Volkl Ski Company, Marmot Clothing, Marker Ski Bindings, Tubbs Snowshoes, WGB Paintball, Innovative Products Inc., and Ex Offico Clothing Company.

Please don’t forget the above list when you make your next purchase that has one of these brand names associated with it. They are no longer “core” rider represented companies. These brands have made their mark… and now are all about how much money they can suck out of you and pass along to someone’s retirement fund.

Sapient Snowboard Company is owned by a Bicycle Company called A. Mordo and Son LTD. a Canadian Distributor of Bikes that also owns the rights to market the following:

Lamar, LTD, (Formally Limited Snowboards from Quebec Canada) Silence, 24/7, M3 Snowboards, (Remember Blaise has since left this company and started M4 Snowboards… much better!!!) and Sapient.

Burton now owns a Surfboard Company called Channel Islands, and prior to that bought the rights to Forum, Four Square, Special Blend and Jeenyus. They market all the aforementioned brands under the tagline “the program” They are also making a small percentage of their boards, all of their bindings and every boot in China. Also worth mentioning is the other snowboard related companies they own:

Anon, Analog, RED, B by Burton, and Gravis Footwear.

The Solomon and Bonfire brand names have changed hands (ownership) three times in the last five years and are no longer owned by Addias but instead by the AMER Sports Group. They Own The Following:

Wilson, Suunto Watches and Electronics, Atomic, Precor USA Fitness Equipment, Salomon, Mavic, Bonfire, DeMarine, Atec, Arc’Teryx Clothing, and The Cliché Skateboard Company.

Volcom is now a publicly traded company contributing to your dads retirement fund. They are no longer in the interest of you the rider… they are now at the disposal of their shareholders.

Vans is part of the VF Corporation. They own the following:

Vans, Wrangler, Reef Footwear and Apperal, Lee Jeans, Riders, Rustler, Britannia, Chic, Gitano, H.I.S., Vanity Fair, Best Form, The North Face, Eastpak, Jan Sport, Kipling, Nautica, Tommy Hilfiger, and a bunch of other non action sports related brands that want nothing to do with you…
The point is this: There are plenty of Snowboard Brands, Outerwear Brands, Eyewear Brands, etc. that want to do business with you only because of the fact that you and they share the same interest: SNOWBOARDING!!!

The above named brands are only in the business of taking your money because you believe that their companies are “cool.” It is up to you to make a clear decision toward the opposite.

These brands are no longer “cool” by virtue of the fact that they are owned by nameless and faceless corporations that want nothing to do with you… they only want your money. It is our sport, our activity… and for some… our life!!! Make a stand damnit.

I do realize that many people (Magazine Publishers, Company Personal, Add Executives, Team Riders, Creative Persons, etc.) are making a living off of these giant corporations and that is not all that bad. They also contribute in the way of event sponsorship and snowboarding promotion… but at what cost. Can’t the “new class” of companies coming up the pipeline (Automaton, Dinosaurs Will Die, Attic Optics, The Lucid Notion Snowboard Company, Stepchild Snowboards, O-Matic, Pure Clothing, Eesa Clothing, Airblaster, Union Bindings, Compatriot, Ill23, etc.) be responsible for taking care of their and your industry?

The Public Advisor encourages each and every one of you to research where your money is spent in your sport and make damn sure that your cash goes to someone that believes in you… not your wallet!

Thanks for your time!

out for now

thanks dude. hopefully this

thanks dude. hopefully this will change some opinions on what companies kids support. buy your products from independent companies who are good for snowboarding, not billion dollar a year corporations that specialize in shape skis, mountain bikes, lacrosse sticks, and cowboy jeans. snowboarding saves lives, help save snowboarding.


age old problem

signal snowboards is doing their part to keep the sport independent

there is a fine line between paying the rent and supporting those around you and selling out
where you draw this line is up to you

do your best to supprot those that help to promote our sport the best you can


bataleon

bataleon is also a core brand owned and managed by snowboarders. they're super cool and keep the snowboard as it'd be.


20 years privately owned!!!

Santa Cruz is owned and operated by the same peeps that started the company 20 years ago. 3 year warranty and snowboards designed and built by people that care about snowboarding. Look where the other guys who have been around for 20 years are, almost 100% of the time there is a board of directors and investors between the ideas and the product. Just sayin...


For sale Brand New Ipaqhw6515 for just $250

Deleted COMMENT! SPAM


what the hell is "core"

its a term that companies use to sucker you into buying their product so that they can become large enough to sell to a buyer themselves. the whole goal of business is success. core is the kid with no money to buy anything anyhow, yet finds a way to ride everyday. not the kid who has a day glow kit from airblaster, and a new capita board.


He's right

The reason GNU, Lib-Tech, Forum and others are now owned by parent companies is because there was a terrible winter in the northwest two years ago and they were not able to sell any product. Because GNU is suddenly owned by quicksilver doesn't mean they don't make great boards in the United States. Mervin manufacturing is still a unique company of folks from the northwest. And richards is right, core is not the rich kids at summer camp, core is doing what you love as often as you can.


Your dreaming....

Qucksilver gutted Mervin like a fish. Boards are made in China and The office is in The Rossignol Building in Utah. A bunch of meathead jocks work there. Mike and Pete cool.


Whoever said they're made in

Whoever said they're made in China needs to get their sh*t correct. Their crappy price point board (The Gnu GT) was made in China and is now made in Spain. All other Gnu/Lib/Roxy boards (save a few low-end Spain-made Roxies) are still made in the factory near Seqium, Washington, which was recently expanded.


Sorry Bro, im just an disgrun

Sorry Bro, im just an disgruntled ex-employee. All shredders are cool. Even Quickshredders.


I didn't contend the employee

I didn't contend the employee remarks though because you're probably not too far off there. Their employees at the Seattle factory (which did close) were offered to transfer (to either Sequim or SLC), but that's just not feasible for some people, so those who couldn't move had to find other work, which does suck.


quickshredders?

.com shredders?! hahahah...


///just the facts

one bad season in the northwest is not the reason mervin was purchased by quicksilver.

and in regards to mervin using china as a production facility, the do not.

quick's utah office is not located in slc, it off the kimbal junction exit in park city.

the same can be said for forum and its sister brands (jeenyus, special blend, etc.) being purchased. however, in forum's case it was years of mis-managment, as in over extending itself.

and to the people saying 'don't buy anything from china"... go throw your playstations and cell phones in the trash, then we can all sit down and talk about global economic structures, and let me just add that the u.s. ain't at the top.

Craig Kelly Forever.


our favorite country!

Economics aside... i am quite positive companies are not moving production to china to make better snowboards.
The consumers who buy their garbage boards will eventually speek due to the poor quality and the economics of no one buying their crap will come back to slap them in the face!

ha..ha....ha.....ha.....ha
The Lucid Notion Snowboard Company

AND IF YOU MYSPACE:

The Lucid Notion Snowboard Company's Silly MySpace Site


///lucid

time (and retailer margins) will tell, i suppose.

Craig Kelly Forever.


well said.

well said todd.
i like your definition of "core".


would it be fair to say..

that to be 'core' (i hate that word) would be to stay true to the values of snow/skate/surf that make them cool in the 1st place? remember, BRANDS are different than COMPANIES. A company is a business organization. Brands are the ideas behind a product in the mind of the consumer. A brand is core if it's true to snowboarding. Whether or not YOU wanna support a certain company is up to you. while i'm not happy that a bunch of people who don't care about snowboarding are in control of the majority of the market, i'm also not pleased with weak brands. oh, and i think it was missed that vz is owned by billabong.

Snowboarding Saves Lives!


VZ=Billabong?

Just checked their site. As sad as it is, my VZ's are infact billabongs. Damn!

Ride SD Fool


Exactly

how long does my company have to not make me money to be considered core?
If I can finally afford 2 hookers instead of just one at a time, am I a sellout?
Can a man really ever return to "just one hooker at a time" status?


Interesting debate

I think that it is an interesting debate- but it is wrong to villanize companies for simply being corporate. Keep in mind that many of these companies started out in exactly the same position as the smalller companies you mention.

Take Volcom for instance, a company that started out printing t-shirts, that has done good enough to grow to the point where they could go public. They were able to accomplish this by staying true to their industry and sports, and yes, they now answer to stockholders to make profits, however their way of doing so is to remain "core". I think they are a great success story from our industry.

Same goes for Burton- started by a guy in a garage with an idea- to make functional snurfers. His vision and advocacy helped spawn an enitre industry.

All of the corporate involvement is not a bad thing- they offer some standardized systems (like warranty departments and substantial R&D) and employ good people with strong ideas.

Corperate snowboarding becomes a bad thing when people start caring more about the bottom line than the sport that got them there in the first place. Competition in the market weeds them out, but to say that corporate snowboarding is bad as a blanket statemnet, in my opinion, is simply not true.

Snowboarding is a free market and if a company strays too far from the sport, the consumers will pass judgement with their wallets.

Also, as the founder of an independent company I see the advantages of having the flexibility to think outside of the box to innovate and push the sport, while making a living, for myself and co-workers doing what I love.

I was a part of Snowboarder when it was indepentently owned- Surfer Publications. Then it transfered to Peterson (corpo) Emap and Primedia. It became frustrating to have people making decisions for the magazine that did not care at all about the sport and saw Snowboarder as a line item. But we fought the good fight and tried to do what was right for snowboarding. Bottom line is that we had to fight off and convince the corpo powers that our decisions made sense financially (all while paying our share of overhead on their private jets and expansive city offices and bloated middle management salaries), as much as we had to focus on what was good to push the sport.

I don't have that problem anymore!


i haven't really kept up on it but

i think at the time of volcom's ipo, woolcott and his sister collectively retained 51% of volcom's shares. so while, yes, a corporation is legally responsible to work in the interests of its shareholders, it's essentially owned and run by the majority shareholder since s/he also controls the most board votes concerning company decisions. there are many reasons to form a business as a corporation or not, but don't be scared of a business filing. i think if a company is doing good for snowboarding (offering quality product, a strong brand), then it's cool with me. i'm not gonna say that ALL corporations are good/bad. many are bad. some are good. you just gotta see through the bs and make up your own mind.

Snowboarding Saves Lives!


can i borrow a dollar?

in snowboarding you try to push and progress everyday. why wouldnt a snowboard company use those same skills in there business. constantly trying to improve and provide a better product. if you do that you have no choice but to be successful.

i do, however, think it sucks when companies that ignored "the industry" for so long and now are trying to push all their chips in late to make some money. but thats just how it works i guess


all grown up

Snowboarding companies needed to grow as the sport grew up, not only for business reasons, but to meet demand as more people bought product, and to continue to push the sport through technology. Oh, and people are involved, and they want to make money. I don't think even TR started O-Matic for charity.

Some companies have failed at growth--like Morrow, which went public too soon, bought too big a factory, and then basically disappered. Burton seems to have a good model by growing through acquisitions and staying private so that it doesn't have to listen to a BOD or a bunch of shareholders waiting to file a lawsuit as soon as they think earinings were inflated. Still, snowboard companies are in business. If they make good product and people want it, they need money to continue to hire good people, pay teamriders (now making a lot more than the $500 month that was once standard), and make and distribute the product. Acquisitions and consolidation were inevitable if snowboarding was going to become more than a fringe sport.

Despite the return of jibbing and the lunch tray, it's not 93/94 anymore. Snowboarding is mainstream. With that, there's good and bad. The good: The product is better than ever from some companies and you can ride most places you want. You don't need to get certified anymore. There's even a website where you can bitch about how corporate the sport is. That's progress. The bad: having someone at a box sports store try to sell me a women's specific 147 as the "perfect" board for me; that Nestea commercial; small guys with new ideas unable to compete like they did in the past.

All and all. Things are pretty good.


Say Whatttttttttttttttttt !

An interesting synopsis of the state of play in the snowboard industry right now . . . however i think its wrong to say not to buy some of these products because you tar all of these companies with the same 'faceless evil corparate empire' brush, and you are wrong . . .

Take Quksilver, they are one of the original boardsports companies - so what if they bought up a load of others, it just gives all of these companies more marketing power, and the funds and ability for people like Mervin to come up with some crazy shit like Magne Traction

In every industry there will always be product from people who dont care - take K2,iwould never buy their product because they really have sold out.

Its sad the way most of my favorite brands have gone though, back in the day Morrow were my favorite brand, istill rate the TR Dino pro model with floorboard bindings as my best ever set up, yet now they are just a budget brand you see in Wal Mart, same with Lamar, its a real shame Rob Morrow and Bert Lamar, 2 core guys if ever there were, names are now associated with crap poroduct like this !

I think of more concern is how so many brands are owend by so few people, in my experiance nothing stumps development moe than this, its good to see people like TR starting out companies like O-Matic, and i amall for giving money to firms like this,, and if they become succesfull because they make good boards, does this mean they are no longer core ? no it just means they are making good product at a good price.

People slag off Burton, but they got where they are for a reason, they made good product, listend to their riders, and made their product better - and them buying up Forum etc saved those companies from being sold to some faceless corpararion - from where i stand Forum has got back that buz it had when they bought out the resistance and true life

Core is snowboarding itself, not the shit that surrounds it

Laterzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


thanks

and very nicely put. burton is a company that i look up to. they have done it the right way, made quality product that the rest of the industry is trying to catch up with ( bindings and bags ) if there were anyone that i would want to model my businees plan after it's jake or bob mckinight. still ride all the time and have a chance to change the face of actionsports (god i hate that term )


Crazy Shit

Ah... Magnetraction. I believe Mike Olsen and Pete Saari would have/could have done it without Quik's help... I have much respect for Mervin for its genius when it comes to board science. I did shed a tear when I heard that Quik bought them out, but thats business... for whatever reasoning there may be. Until they make a board I don't like, I'll still support them. And I'll always have love & respect for where Mervin Mfg has taken snowboarding.

I agree that you should support what you love for your own reasons and stay true to yourself...that's what makes up a 'core' rider to me. As long as you are doing it for the love of the ride... nothing else truly matters. And I will always support anything that progresses our sport of snowboarding. Regardless of the PC.


mervin

the reason pete and Molsen "sold out" is because they got tired of the stress and ups and downs, i don't blame them for taking a big pay day to keep on doing what they do, with less pressure, stoked for them!


Whatever It Takes...

To make it happen. Glad they can worry less about the $$ and more about the love of the ride. I just hate seeing bigger companies steer the vision... hope they stay true to theirs as much as possible. Not hating at all on Quik- they've always been board driven. Respect.


Agree..

No propblem with burton down here in denver. I agree with todd as far as the business models go. Phil started his company out of the trunk of his car. Everyone thought he was nutts.... now look!

ha..ha....ha.....ha.....ha
The Lucid Notion Snowboard Company

AND IF YOU MYSPACE:

The Lucid Notion Snowboard Company's Silly MySpace Site


core snowboards?

u say core? Go buy a damn Smokin' Snowboard from Smokin' Jay himself if u get the chance. The minute you meet him you will know why you need one or maybe 5. Just dont be in a hurry and youll be surprised! Buy one of his boards, they rock!
We won top 10 good wood making boards in a ghetto basement, now he has a bangin new factory just outta tahoe. viva la Smokin'!


hmmm.....

while i do agree the wrong people have a lot of power, you can't turn against certain companies entirly. just remember companies like Burton started out just as small as M4, Stepchild, and Automation. i think people need to focus on the product. Burton's Dominant and K2's WWW and Darkstarpray are affordable freestyle boards that do what they are designed to do. Don't hate on people for making it big. Give it time and a good majority of the brands you say are now "core" will be in the exact same position as Volcom, Burton. And for those less fortunate, they will be selling themselfs to those who made it.
Please dont get me wrong, im all for supporting the little guys. I think Automation, M4, Airblaster, etc... are doing some of the best things in snowboarding today. Just don't be so quick turn on a company as soon as they become financially stable.

pray for snow.....
love pe@ce & chicken gre@se


well done

thank you for bringing up such a brilliant and valid page of information that is, i along with many others think, highly overlooked. some would argue that it would be pointless to distinguish core from mainstream or sold-out from original. it would also be pointless to attempt to inform those buying said products that they might be supporting something that they talk so strongly about not suppoprting without even knowing it. that being said (ha) a lot of people that support one company with all the compassion and loyalty in the world, are supporting something that has nothing to do with snowboarding, or them at all. supporting, reping and marketing all the while not knowing that the company is under a corp that they never knew about, but because they didn't know this, it's still fun for them and their buddies to rip on the kid with the volcom hat.

i am not one to say or aruge said articles. i think that being core isn't how many times you ride or which getup you have or how many repeating setups are found within your crew, but moreso as long as you are happy and are spreading fun throughout wherever it is that you ride, that's all that matters. that being said (ha) i think that supporting a company that supports you is important. you are not only buying and supporting snowboarding and a truely snowboard company that gives back to you, but you are keeping that company alive and not buying to the companys that could give a shit about how stoked on the product you are, the ones that you would have a better chance of talking to them and having their respect if you were the owner of a factory in china, than YOU: the rider.

all that said, there are always going to be people that hate companys to the point where they wouldn't be caught dead riding with a kid with a certain kin of hoodie on. i think that sucks

ride with everyone
support the companys that support you and work towards the positive growth of snowboarding, not the growth of pocketbooks


does nobody else think that i

does nobody else think that it doesnt matter what your riding as long as your doing it everyday and by any means neccesary? the kid who has everything burton or k2 or anything corparate is just as into the sport as a guy who only buys C3 products. just as long as your up there everyday, why bitch and moan about where you shit came from? chances are most people complaining about this shit ride gear from the companies listed above. i do too, big deal.

but just wondering, does anyone own rome, cuz if not somebody is bound to soon

-support local-


you're right about being stoked on shred.

however, i think the problem with buying products from companies that have interests other than snowboarding is the same one consolidated has been pointing out in skateboarding: by supporting these companies, money leaves our industry. cash flow is the bloodstream of business. if buying brand x's snow crap means that brand x can now afford to go into paintball or something, how does that help snowboarding? know where your money goes! does it go to make higher quality yet more affordable snowboards, or to buy some ceo's kid a new suv? which one of those options benefits shredding?

big companies have to move volume just to sustain themselves. therefore, most corporate brands need to appeal to a lot of people. the lack of focus creates a weak brand. brands are the ideas associated with a product. an industry of weak brands in turn propagates a weak culture. it's the culture of snowboarding that needs saving. the culture is one of the things that made snowboarding cool in the 1st place. back before the x-games and olympics made snowboarding look like 2 halfpipe runs. look at skateboarding. yeah, they have mt dew and playstation up in there. but skating is strong. skaters are proud. because skating is made up of strong brands that speak to and for people. brands created by skaters. back in the day, they didn't allow non-endemic companies into their world. and this is why skaters own skating. snowboarding by contrast is young. it's growing. but as shreds, we gotta make sure that 10, 20, 100 years down the road, snowboarders own snowboarding.

Snowboarding Saves Lives!


Seems the point is missed though...

Interesting Debate:

Props to people and their opinions. It is good to see so much heart from all the snowboarders that make up this magazine.

I think the point is this though? ( and i may be wrong)

People bitch and complain to help envoke change. If gigantic companies begin to control our industry it is likely that we will all be riding panasonic snowboards, with marker bindings connected to the new snowboard boot made by crocs in the future.
If no one gets involved and just simply takes what "they" give you... there will be no future and that is a big deal.
The rider owned companies (ours too) do not go out of their way to label themselves "core" and they do want to grow. We all would have a better chance at survival if the consumers were more educated as to what they are actually supporting.... and if consumers don't care... then so be it. From the looks of this forum though... most riders do care!!! And change is already here....

***One Last Note*** It is snowing above 10,000 feet out here... let's all have a great winter!!

ha..ha....ha.....ha.....ha
The Lucid Notion Snowboard Company

AND IF YOU MYSPACE:

The Lucid Notion Snowboard Company's Silly MySpace Site


rome?

i was recently told from a rome coolguy that rome is taking over and is apparently going to be #2 by next year....anyone know if this is total bullshit? or is rome actually as banging as they claim? this would mean they are overtaking k2 which isnt horrible at all but is this just BS coolguy hype about rome?

FUNBOARDING FOREVER!
support your locals


#2 is doubtful in the SBC bus

#2 is doubtful in the SBC business from earlier this year I believe Rome was at #5 for canadian dealers which is very impressive. I believe it went Burton, K2, Ride, Forum, Rome. Rome has been doing very well maybe they will jump ahead to #4 but to top one of those brands would be very impressive for a brand in its first 5 or so years.


Doubtful on Rome's position in the industry?

As much as a waste of time bantering about who is in top, can be, polls and numbers don't reveal the true numbers on top rated boards regarding volume of sales. The first 4 brands as noted are also found in Big Box chain stores and malls. Rome isn't. If you look at the sales figures regarding true units sold in brick and mortar stores, the results would be alarming with Rome on the top 3 tier. On the other side too, riders are influenced by what is advertised on the first 10 pages in magazines. There are boards out there that ride (insert opinion here...) better than Burton, K2, Ride and Forum like Nidecker. But because of their extemely week North American advertising campaign, they have a hard time getting clout in the US.

I am a shop manager that's been in the industry for 13 years. Yea the mainstream-ness of boarding is becoming a pain. It's inevidable though that all the beginners that buy they kits in malls or chain stores like Sports Authority will become better, older and shop at the independent dealers. Just don't position your shop next to a Zumiez or Box Store.


Ive seen

I've seen Rome boards in a Denver Mall before. not trying to be a jerk, but i've seen em


nada enchilada

...okay
so once again i feel that arguing is irrelevant especially when it comes to something that we all love i.e. snowboarding. but a great point is proven in each comment following the point that was brought up in the original post that i have figured out completely: 2+7=9

no matter what one person says, there is ten more to conflict the said opinion. snowboarding costs money. where, who, and how much you contribute is totally up to the rider, which becomes the birth of their style. buying one item does not in any way mean that you can't buy this other company's items. that's the beauty in snowboarding, it can be and mean as much as you want it. anything said about a company in this industry is going to snowball into a abnormally large game of telephone. "i heard rome is sick brah..." . . . . . . . .ten comments later via ten different minds becomes- "you hear rome like bought south africa?..."
everything is different to everyone which is what feeds the industry....DIFFERENT OPINIONS. where you put your two cents in or your 700 dollars in is up to you, just know that the future of snowbaording is you, the rider. 10 days, 120 days, core, hesh, ghettohesh, whatever, its all up to you. the future of the companys that care about you is up to you as well...
we all love snowboarding because of what it does for us and what it "is" is not a sport, not a product, not a season, but rather us...the riders

give high fives!


nada enchilada

...okay
so once again i feel that arguing is irrelevant especially when it comes to something that we all love i.e. snowboarding. but a great point is proven in each comment following the point that was brought up in the original post that i have figured out completely: 2+7=9

no matter what one person says, there is ten more to conflict the said opinion. snowboarding costs money. where, who, and how much you contribute is totally up to the rider, which becomes the birth of their style. buying one item does not in any way mean that you can't buy this other company's items. that's the beauty in snowboarding, it can be and mean as much as you want it. anything said about a company in this industry is going to snowball into a abnormally large game of telephone. "i heard rome is sick brah..." . . . . . . . .ten comments later via ten different minds becomes- "you hear rome like bought south africa?..."
everything is different to everyone which is what feeds the industry....DIFFERENT OPINIONS. where you put your two cents in or your 700 dollars in is up to you, just know that the future of snowbaording is you, the rider. 10 days, 120 days, core, hesh, ghettohesh, whatever, its all up to you. the future of the companys that care about you is up to you as well...
we all love snowboarding because of what it does for us and what it "is" is not a sport, not a product, not a season, but rather us...the riders

give high fives!


NS

How about buying a board because you demo'd it and liked the way it rode?

You guys should just buy Never Summers. And please buy it at your local shop.

The online retailer vs the blood, sweat and tears shop owner argument is for a whole 'nother thread...


updated list?

So I found this thread through a google search or something and want to resurrect it to find out about any updates to this list. Anybody have anything to add to this or edits to make? I've always tried to be an informed buyer, and the more info out there the better. And if anybody has a similar list for the skateboard industry (shoes especially...) a link would be much appreciated!